THE PROPOSED EDUCATION BILL.
to the Editor of the Thames Guardian. Sir, —Appended to your repo-t of last night’s debate on the Education Bill, I find the following words : “Our reporter, who was on the platform was of opinion that the ruling was correct, although the majority was not large.” Well, sir, with all due respect to your reporter’s opinion, I repeat my firm conviction that the show of hands d.dared, by a decided majority, in favor of Denominationalism. Had tho proposed division of the house been feasible, I have no doubt but that my decision would he proved the true oac. Besides, I have to remark that the Press outsteps its duty in giving any opinion in such a matter. To furnish the public with a faithful report of the proceedings, and nothing else, was your duty, unless 1 mistake. Hoping you will favor me with a small space in your valuable columns.— I am, &c., J. Golden. Shortlaud, July 19, 1872. ♦
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TGMR18720720.2.22.2
Bibliographic details
Thames Guardian and Mining Record, Volume I, Issue 244, 20 July 1872, Page 3
Word Count
163THE PROPOSED EDUCATION BILL. Thames Guardian and Mining Record, Volume I, Issue 244, 20 July 1872, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in