THE DAVIS-MILLEDGE CASE.
Melbourne, August 16
Sir B. O'Loghien replying to a question admitted that the public had some reason for dissatisfaction at the result of the prosecution of Davies and Milledge. He attributed it to their not having the English Grand Jury system in operation, and thought it should ba permanently established.
The magistrate refused the applications for summonses in connection with the Mercantile Bank cases on the ground that similar applications had previously been made; also that the accused had been put to great expense. An animated discussion took place between the counsel and the magistrate. The latter stated that they could apply to the Supreme Court if they chose. Counsel intimated that they would take further steps.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18930819.2.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Temuka Leader, Issue 2544, 19 August 1893, Page 1
Word count
Tapeke kupu
120THE DAVIS-MILLEDGE CASE. Temuka Leader, Issue 2544, 19 August 1893, Page 1
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in