RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Temuka—Tuesday, April 12, 1892. [Before C. A. Wray, Esq. ; R.M.] BREACH OF THE SHEEP ACT J. Ashwell was charged on the information of Mr Douglas, Sheep Inspector, with having 300 sheep in his possession not having the registered brand of the owner. P. Waroiug was charged with a similar offence in respect of 150 sheep. Bjth defendants were fined Id per head. BREACH OF COUNTY BY-LAWS. Geraldine County Council v. M. Scannell. The defendant was charged with taking a traction engine over the Temuka bridge. The case was adjourned for 14 days. CIVTL CASES. J. T. M. Hayhurst v. W. Hooper— Claim £l7 4s for 86 weeks rent.—Judgment for plaintiff with costs. Watson v. Armitage. Mr Salmond for plaintiff. In this case plaintiff sued for possession of a house occupied by defendant. Defendant stated that he had no objection to leave the house, but had experienced difficulty in obtaining another. He had employed no house agents, but could not get a dwelling. Edward Pilbrow, agent for plaintiff, gave evidence as to tenancy, rent, and as to the requisite notice having been given. Order made to leave the premises ■within a week. The court then rose.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18920414.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Temuka Leader, Issue 2343, 14 April 1892, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
198RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Temuka Leader, Issue 2343, 14 April 1892, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in