THE BACCARAT CASE.

Temuka Leader, Issue 2213, 11 June 1891, Page 1

THE BACCARAT CASE.

;Loxboh, Jane 8 . ■ln ;the coarse of ibis replyaa the baccarat oassjto-day, Sin Edward Clarke, jibe Soiici.torr,'general, 'declared that after I the evidence which, had: boenvtakea- it, jwagfimposßiblesto ; remove* Sir Wiilllam I Gordon Cnmcoing’s name frem thaArmy List urithoDt-torasißg the name of H»*R. H,, the-Prince of iWales and General Owen Williams, This statement created dmimensesensation in conn. ;i Counsel contended that* Mr Stanley Wilson; was originally mistaken in the Which, ha put upon plaintiff's style of !play,and that he afterwards sought to entrap his guest. Jt was impossible to i understand the conduct of the Prince of ; Wales, Lord Coventry, and Mr Stanley Wilson, in believing their oomirade gniUy of the charges made! against him, and his (counsel’s) own belief was ithat much of the evidence'which conld have been given in plaintiff's favor had |evidetffly.been sacrificed in a desire to bits the Prince of Wales from exposure. elicited loud applause from the body of the oourt, 1 k H.K.H. ; the Prince of 'Wales has i nominated Mr Stanley ■ Wilson, Who I gave evide nee' avid cnee ’ in the baccarat icase,a member of the Marlborough Club.