Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURTS.

Napiek, Dec. 9, In the Supreme Court yesterday, Joseph Norden Bell was found guilty of rape and remanded for sentence. Two boys, Connor and Roe, wepe found guilty respectively of Jioqaebrealnng an d forgery, They were ordered to enter into recognisances to come up for judgment when called upon. In Bell’s case the Crown entered a nolle prosequi against the second indict? ment, to sate the female children wit? nefSea the ordeal of repeating disgusting evidence. Dec. IQ In the Supreme Court to-day Joseph N. Bell, was brought up for sentence. The Judge sentenced the prisoner to ten years' penal servitude for rape an 4 three years for indecent assault, the sentences to run concurrently. The last case on the calendar is being tried to-day—a case of apson that occurred at Woodville, Istv'becakgij.l, Dec. 10. The guppeipe Court was occupied yeE ; terday hearing a charge agaipst Ben ; jamin Bowin of breaking and entering a store at Thornley from which he stole the

cun ’cn ta of the till, and also a charge of »r?on, he having set fire to the place to hide the first crime. He was sentenced to five years’ penal servitude for arson and two for housebreaking, the sentences to be concurrent. In the action Duncan Clarke v. Murray, Dalgleish and Co., claim £450, money entrusted for investment, the defence was that the money sued for was loaned to John Daigleish as a private individual with defendant’s knowledge and consent. After five minutes’ consideration the jury returned an answer to the issue set before them as follows ; “Was the sum of £450 paid by Murray, Dalgleish and Co. to John Dalgleish with the authority of the plaintiff Clark ? Yes.” Judgment was entered accordingly.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18861211.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Temuka Leader, Issue 1524, 11 December 1886, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
288

SUPREME COURTS. Temuka Leader, Issue 1524, 11 December 1886, Page 3

SUPREME COURTS. Temuka Leader, Issue 1524, 11 December 1886, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert