Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RIGHTS OF TENANTS.

NO PROTECTION FOR EX-SOLDIERS. ON SAME BASIS AS OTHERS. AN IMPORTANT JUDGMENT. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Wellington, Last Night. An important judgment was given today by Sir John Salmond, in a test case, Wi. Robinson v. A. Laurie, a landlord, the effect of which is that soldier tenants are now, in respect of all premises occupied by them, whether as dwelling-houses or as shops, in the same position as any other tenants. It was an appeal against' a decision by Mr. Hunt, S.M., and had to io with a combined shop and dwelling-house. It was contended on appellant’s behaj that, even though the special protection previously afforded soldier tenants in respect of dwellings might no longer exist, . returned men or their dependents within the meaning of the Act still retained special protection afforded by Section 13 of the former Act in respect of shops, notwithstanding the provisions of the new Act. After referring to the wording of several Acts and amendments, His Honor said: “If, therefore, the special protection conferred on his actual dwelling-house by that action has disappeared by expiry or the implied repeal of an earlier portion of the section, the protection of his constructive dwelling-house must have disappeared also. In the absence of sub-section (1) of section 13 as to dwelling-houses, sub-sectiou (6) as to shops would be inoperative, as it is not a self-contained and independent provision. It means merely that a soldier shall have the same protection for his shop as is conferred upon him by section 13 in respect of his dwelling-house, and if section 13 no longer confers any such protection in respect of his dwelling-house, it cannot do so in respect of his shop either.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19220630.2.62

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 30 June 1922, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
285

RIGHTS OF TENANTS. Taranaki Daily News, 30 June 1922, Page 5

RIGHTS OF TENANTS. Taranaki Daily News, 30 June 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert