A BEAUTY SPECIALIST
CLAIM FOR TEN THOUSAND. ALLEGED BREACH OF PROMISE By Telegraph—Press Association. Wellington, Feb. 27. In the Supreme Court this morning, before Mr. Justice Hosking and a jury of 12, the breach o-f promise action, Eileen Frances Tate v. George Winder was commenced. Plaintiff was formerly in business here as a beauty specialist and claim? £lO,OOO. Mr. Wilford is for plaintiff and Mr. Gray, K.C., with Mr. Weston, for defendant. The statement of claim was that plaintiff and defendant agreed in June last to marry, that plaintiff had sold her business, stock and goodwill in the following month, that she had spent £lOO in clothing suitable for the wedding and that in November Winder refused to go on with the wedding. Her claim is made up of £lOOO damages for loss on the sale o-f her business £lOO in respect of trousseau and £9OOO for loss of marriage and injury to her feelings. The case is proceeding.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19220228.2.56
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, 28 February 1922, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
159A BEAUTY SPECIALIST Taranaki Daily News, 28 February 1922, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in