Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RURAL MAIL DELIVERY.

PROTEST AT THE GHARGES. CLIFTON COUNTY DISCUSSION. The rural mail service system was discussed at the monthly meeting of the Clifton County Council yesterday. The Woodville County Council wrote asking for the council’s support and cooperation in pressing the following resolution:—“That this council, on behalf of the settlers of the County of Woodville protests against the imposition of a rural delivery fee by the PostmasterGeneral, it being, in their opinion, a form of indirect taxation applied to country settlers who are at a very great disadvantage, as compared with to town dwellers, so far as postal facilities are concerned. They are also of opinion that, if more revenue is desired from this service ix should be imposed, by means of postal rates, and we urge upon the Government to withdraw such intended rural delivery fee.”

It was pointed out that the proposed rural delivery fee takes effect on January 1, 1922, and public meetings held in the Woodville* County were of unanimous opinion that the fee should be strongly opposed. Cr. H. Foreman said the people in the country should get every facility. The townpeople had. their delivery twice a day. and it seemed hard that the country people had to ride miles to get their mail. Cr. F. C. Jones thought that if they wanted rural delivery they should be prepared to pay for it. Mr. R. Mounsey suggested that the private bag system would be the best, if the cost were reasonable. Mr. Foreman asked why the country people should be charged £2 per year to have their letters delivered three times a week, whilst letters were delivered twice daily in the towns for notin'ng. The chairman (Mr. R. IT. Piggott) said that they were crying out for (he Government to economise, and if the settlers wanted economy they could not expect the Government to pay more money in instituting a better mail delivery.

It was decided that the letter should be received, an amendment by Mr. Foreman that the council should suppint Ihi resolution lapsing for want of a seconder.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19211105.2.74

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 5 November 1921, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
346

RURAL MAIL DELIVERY. Taranaki Daily News, 5 November 1921, Page 7

RURAL MAIL DELIVERY. Taranaki Daily News, 5 November 1921, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert