Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE GAMING LAW.

A CONVICTION REMOVED. CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE. Bv T»l<cranh —Press Awoofttion Gisborne, Last Night. Mr. Justice Reed to-day heard an a|> peal by Arthur Owen against the magistrate’s conviction and sentence of two months’ imprisonment on a charge of keeping a common gaming house. In his evidence to-day, the chief police witness, Joseph Brown, contradicted himself so frequently under crossexamination by .Mr. M. Myers, that the latter suggested to Mr. Justice Reed that it was useless to go further. Mr. Nolan (Crown Prosecutor) agreed, unless the police evidence was sufficient without Brown. His Honor said Brown’s statements were so obviously contradictor)’ that the evidence could not be accepted. The appeal was allowed and the conviction quashed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19210628.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 28 June 1921, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
117

THE GAMING LAW. Taranaki Daily News, 28 June 1921, Page 4

THE GAMING LAW. Taranaki Daily News, 28 June 1921, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert