SEARLE V. N.P. HIGH SCHOOL BOARD.
(To' tlio Editor.) j Sir,—Referring to your report of this case, otherwise a full report, may I, as Mi\ Searle's solicitor, ask you to mention Hint Mr. Campbell, for the successful. appellant, protested against the non-allowance of costs to him? For a successful plaintiff, especially as appellant, not to lie allowed costs is so entirely unusual and against all legal usage that one is much surprised at the Court's ruling, uptil tha fact is remembered tiiat where a Court, as this one, is without the assistance of solicitors, under the curious provisions of the Act, anything may happen—and often doe3 —I am, etc. L. ETHERINGTON. New Plymouth, Tune 17.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19200618.2.11.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, 18 June 1920, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
115SEARLE V. N.P. HIGH SCHOOL BOARD. Taranaki Daily News, 18 June 1920, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in