Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PERJURY CHARGE.

THE WI HAPE CASE! By Telegraph.—Press Association. Hamilton, March 80., The Wi Hape case was continued. The witness Mnhia denied being at thd ' ' Aurora Hotel with Wi Hape, as statej - ' in tlie latter's confession, which alleged that. Mr Lundon induced Wi Hap® to /• 1 spirit Afphia away. The barman of the Aurora Hotel, itt 1 -v. Auckland, said that an entry in a iook: vf produced was his, showing the rooui paid) 'r for by two natives giving their names: ' '£j as Wi jHape. " , ,p r Counsel for the accused said that the ■ hitter would swear that his confession », ' was absolutely true. 1 Sergeant Cassels said he believed 'the Natives had given Air Lundon a largo' ' sum of money to appear for them, Counsel submitted that the accuwtt ' ' was only carrying out the instruction* of V. Mr Lundon. . * i

ACCUSED FOUND GUILTY. ■ Hamilton, Last Nighf. . ,V, Tliis afternoon accused swore in the ' J bo* that his confession, which was read' yesterday, was absolutely true. . Mr. >Lundon, solicitor for the defence Vat the Rua trial, *vas called as a wit- "3 nesp. When in the bo\ he ''"ji fiontcd with Wi Hape's confession. ' His leply was: "It'is. an infamous lie." Wit-, 4 ness then entered upon a lengthy statu* "•«- ment, in which he nllegcd that the whole 5 .•$ matter was a conspiracy against him; ia« /'f eluding, amopgst others, the solicitor for the defence (Mr. Hampson) as one of the central figures. , ■!>. Air. Mays, for the Crown, in addressing 1 > the jury, said this was a serious ftt« ,£'] tewnt to stamp out 4 hideous form ot conspiracy and perjury, which had been V j built up and had entwined itself around • r. the criminal law. , .''j Summing up, his Honor said that ix( considering the charge against the ac< I eused the jury had to decide whether by</%' doing the acts alleged against him ho "ffll had wilfully defeated and obstructed the *J course of justice. , "3 After a retirement of forty min»te»j S the jury 'found accused guilty. Prisoner I .' A <vas renjanded for sentence until the con«! ' 'V' elusion of the sitting. The other cases, were adjourned until Wednesday mom* y

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19170321.2.26

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 21 March 1917, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
364

PERJURY CHARGE. Taranaki Daily News, 21 March 1917, Page 5

PERJURY CHARGE. Taranaki Daily News, 21 March 1917, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert