Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNUSUAL LAW CASE.

A QUESTION OF TRUST. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Wellington, .Tunc fi. A case in which plaintiff sought repudiation of trust came before Mr. Justice ETosking at the Supreme Court today. Plaintiff was Mary Isabel Toms, wife of Frank Howard Toms, of Auckland} and defendant was the 'Public Trustee. The Court was asked to set aside the settlement or trust created by a certain document, 011 the ground that plaintiff, at the time of executing the document, had no experience of legal or business matters, and wag quite ignorant of its effect and the incidence of trust created.

Plaintiff asserted that these matters were not explained to her at the time the document was signed, and she prayed that it be. cancelled, and also for an order requesting the defendant to deliver up all moneys and securities held by defendant on behalf of the plaintiff. The statement of defence was that the position was fully explained to the plaintiff when she signed the deed of trust, and that she appeared to understand tlie position thoroughly. Mr. A. E. Skelton, ot Auckland, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. E. P„ Hay represented tlie Public Trustee. In opening, Mr. Skelton stated that the case was a verj unusual one in Kew Zealand courts. It was to set aside a duly signed document, hut lie would show quite plainly that plaintiff was always simple-minded and unsophisticated as a girl. At the age of 21 she came into £I7OO, left hv her grandfather,' the late ffm. Jsichoih. of Featherston. Later plaintiff married, and on the advice of her solicitor. Mr. T. M, Page, of Eketahuna, she signed n, trust settlement, believing, however, that a private trustee had been appointed, because she had statwl plainly that sh was opposed to the appointment of the Public Trustee. Xo imputations were made against Page. The case is unfinished.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19160608.2.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 8 June 1916, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
311

UNUSUAL LAW CASE. Taranaki Daily News, 8 June 1916, Page 2

UNUSUAL LAW CASE. Taranaki Daily News, 8 June 1916, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert