Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RAILWAY EMPLOYEE'S CASE.

A QUESTION OF PROMOTION. Ey Telegraph.—Press Association. Dunedin, Last Night. A sitting o.t the South Island Railway Appeal Board ivas held to-day, when John McXair, an assistant engineer at Dunedin, appealed against the action of the Department in superseding him on 1)3 list. Mr. 'MoVilly said that McNair was superseded. by Jeffreys on list 'D3 in 11)1.'). McXair was above Jeffreys and in 1914 their respective positions were ItcXair No. S in grade (t, Jeffreys No. 44 in grade G. Since then Jeffreys had been promoted to the position of district engineer at Oliakuna. McNair was still in grade (i and Jeffreys in grade 5. •James Burnett, chief engineer in charge, of the maintenance branch, said in making the appointment at Oha.kune he came to the conclusion that. Jeffreys was the most suitable officer for the position, and so recommended accordingly. A person who left the Government service for increased rename!ation (appellant went from the Public Works Department to the Manawahi railway) and drifted back to the Government was not entitled to more consideration or the same consideration as tlioso who remained in the service of the Government. He did not think the same training was possible on the Manawatu railway. The President: The impression you. have given is that a person who leaves the Government for incron"cd pay and returns is not entitled to tin; same consideration as one who remains in the Government service? Witness: That is so. To Mr. McVilly: He would not aUivv his personal opinion on this question to warp his judgment in making a. ircommcndation. I'\ W. MaeLean, inspecting engineer, said he had no hesitation in saying that Jeffreys was the much more' qualified man of the two iii the work of the Department. James Burnett, recalled, qualified what he had previously said by the remark that he would not let the fact weigh with him in considering the qualification of the respective officers, but would consider their exporicncw and work. 'ilr. McPherson announced that the evidence of the Public Works officers was being taken on commission in Wellington. and, this being so, the inquiry was adjourned sine die.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19150528.2.54

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 300, 28 May 1915, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
358

RAILWAY EMPLOYEE'S CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 300, 28 May 1915, Page 8

RAILWAY EMPLOYEE'S CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 300, 28 May 1915, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert