Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INFLATED LAND VALUES.

MAGISTRATE'S STRICTURES. "JUGGLING WITH FIGURES." By Telegraph.—Press Association. Auckland L,ast Night, Magistrate Kettle mado some vevv strong comments to-day in the' ease in which a land agent, Andrew McNeil, proceeded against a farmer, George' Fanner, for commission alleged to bo due in respect to an exchange of land. It was stated in evidence that the farmer put his property into McNe'is hands for sale at not less than £25 per acre, but McNeil was unable to effect a sale. He then found another landowner willing to exchange, whose farm was reputed to be worth £7 10s pejr acre. The two landowners agreed that for the purposes of the exchange their land should be valued at £35 and £9 lfis respectively, and an agreement was ratified accordingly. McNeil, however, claimed his 21 per cent, commission from Farmer at the price of £35 per acre, and Farmer refused to pay this, and wanted to pay on tlic l>asis of £25 per acre. Neither litigant could satisfactorily comply with the Magistrate's request for an expanation of the increased values, and the latter said that it was a case of "fictitious valuation." Then he proceeded: "What purpose is it put up for, excepting for swindling someone. It is high time this kind of thing was put a stop to. This is the worst, case of tlie kind I have seen. If it is true then the value of £35 per acre was a bogus one. If it was bogus then it must have been put on to deceive someone. It is time the Court spoke out about these cases." Counsel for defendant: I say my client was persuaded to put up the valuation to £35. Mr. Kettle: For what.object? Counsel: I don't know. Mr. Kettle: McNeil swears that the valuations are true ones as given by both parties. If the true value of the land was £35 per acre why should not defendant pay the commission upon that amount ? Having spoken out further, and described the transaction as "juggling with figures," Mr. Kettle reserved his decision.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19150325.2.45

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 245, 25 March 1915, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
345

INFLATED LAND VALUES. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 245, 25 March 1915, Page 5

INFLATED LAND VALUES. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 245, 25 March 1915, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert