Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIVORCE CASE.

CONSTRUCTIVE DESERT! ON.

Per Press Association. Auckland, Tuesday.

. An important judgment hi divorce was given to-day by Mr. Justice Cooper at the Supreme Court. In the action the parties were Adolph Frederick William Lorie. (petitioner )and Sardh' Ellen Lorie (respondent). The ground of the petition (was. the .alleged desertion by the respondent' of the petitioner for a period lof over five 'veil vs. The parties were married in December, 1881, and'lived together for hiimv'yeais;-' there being several. of the.carriage;,, T.li.e desertion alleged , was : said tp. have c.ommcncqd ,in May, ll)0fi. and to have continued ,ever since.. jKo'r some,years prior tp' ibOtV tf)'e 'parties had not lived 'to- j and oil Vfanuai'y; 10, 1905, a.n 'agreement '6f' separation \vas entered into. 1 The actual' separation did not last lonjV but' erased" i'n 'May, 1903. and the J 'jpai-ties; lived'''together ijts -man' and' wife I uriffi' tile''-M:'pi tJjW vbifr/'- Later- she' 'had, I 'refused' to live' with 'him, although > he : had'repeatedly asked her to do so.'' ' The Jjittdpienf 'set forth 1 that 'the- (jues-; tifin to'be dWided : xvaS'Whether the prbv-' 'e'd- farts eonsti'tutfed a- ease' Of' constructive desertion sthe iref>p<vndenfc having! per- j sistehtly! frdm the year 190R -refused..to allo\v' ! h'er hlusband;t r 6'. cohabit'with lier, the." parties.-j. for-.,someH time since then Jivediiti tlft feaijiß .hO))se.j .CDncludin'j&iithe /deeisiion .statfid .rthpit the.correspondence i wnielv. -had <tw,e.ei* : the., jpai-t.i.e&;clearly ; established/ •thftt ">.• many, waj^efyigqd. : to'tyeat, petitioner as > iier husband or to consider him ths.lmad,, O.f o th« »gi pp^s^aiitially; entitled, .i.q'.i t[ vpice (l iij, tte'inanagementii of tne'''family I .''-"lit mr"'(His opinion, the petitioner had-established' -tt'i'case of constructive desertion, com'ift«ncinn; at the end'of 1800, and confcintil)' tire ipresent time, and-this desertion had been without any reasoniabla ca.use. 1 ' There/ must therefore .be a decree, nisi for of marriage, to be made absolute at the expiration of three months. ,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19130319.2.76

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LV, Issue 256, 19 March 1913, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
305

DIVORCE CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LV, Issue 256, 19 March 1913, Page 8

DIVORCE CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LV, Issue 256, 19 March 1913, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert