THE INDER CASE

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 302, 18 June 1912, Page 3

THE INDER CASE

STRONG REMARKS BY MAGISTRATE. By Telegraph—Frees Association. Auckland, June 16. The hearing of the case of Leah Lillian Inder v. William Francis Inder, to recover £lO2, alleged to be due as arrears of maintenance guaranteed under deed of separation mutually agreed upon, was resumed by Mr. Kettle, S.M., yesterday. Mr. Singer appeared for the complainant) and Mr, l)cnniston for defendant. ••Mr. Singer stated that since the adjournment some extremely important evidence had come to his knowledge, and he had subpoenaed other witnesses t9 give evidence as to certain facts he had been informed with regard to some, of the witnesses for the defence, and 119 thought he should be afforded an opportunity of cross-examining thenv again. Mr. Kettle: Those witnesses are disharged from attendance. J Mr. Singer: Your Worship said you were going- to search this c,%se to the bottomv " • Sir. Kettle said that when the case was finished' lie would report the whole circumstances to the police, as it was evident, there -had been the grossest perjury on one side or the other, apparently conspiracy. ■ Mr. Singer: Fortunately, I can prove it. 1 Mr. Kettle said that if such was the case Mr. Singer had only to lay all the facts before the police. Mr. Singer and Mr. Denniston both offered to give every assistance if His Worship reported the facts to the police. Further evidence was then heard, and the case adjourned to enable another witness -to be called.