AN OPAL LAW SUIT
A TANGLED STORY. ] London, April 25. In the case of Bradley and Cohn (Ltd) V. Ramsay and Co., an action to recover possession of a parcel of opals fa*) damages for their detention, the Court of Appeal upheld Mr. Justice Phillimore's decision. The plaintiffs are shipping merchants, carrying on business in London and Australia. In 1008 they received from a firm in Sydney a parcel of black opals for exhibition at Shepherd's Rush Exhibition. A jeweller, Isadore Braun, induced plaintiffs to let him have the stones on approbation. He refused to give £750, their stated value, but offered £3OO. The offer was communicated to the Australian owner, but before the reply was received Braun had sold the stones to defendants for £3OO. He then went bankrupt, and as defendants would not restore the stones the plaintiffs brought, an action. Judgment had been previously obtained by plaintiffs against Braun for £750. The Judge held that the_ procedure in the plaintiffs' action against Braun debarred the plaintiffs from recovering in the action against Ramsay and Company.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19120429.2.44
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 256, 29 April 1912, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
178AN OPAL LAW SUIT Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 256, 29 April 1912, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.