Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SCIENTIST ON THE BUDGET

INTERESTING SPEECH BY MR. G. M THOMPSON. By Telegraph—Press Association. Wellington, Last Night. One of the most interesting speeches delivered in the House during the present deibate was that made by Mr. G. M. Thompson, the member for Dunedin North. He referred from the scientific point of view to the re-grassing of the Otago Central lands. In that region desert conditions prevailed, and it was a region of small rainfall. It had been enormously overstocked in the past, and burnt to an idiotic extent. He advocated treeiplantinsr, but added that it was a fallacy to think that tree-planting increased the rainfall of a country. It did not, but it made a great difference in the humidity of the climate and in the retention of moisture. He maintained that it was necessary for the Government to go in for afforestation on scientific lines. It would pay the country to get a thoroughly trained man, and pay him £IOOO a year. There was a lack of scientific training evident in our present forestry methods, For instance, we had been planting millions of eucalyptus stewartiani, which had l>een proved' by the greatest living authorities to be the most worthless of all the eucalypti as a timber or wen as a firewood timber.

Mr. Thompson put quite a new complexion upon the glowing periods- with which the Government have been wont to refer to the manufacture of nitrate manures in connection with the proposed livdro electric power scheme, If, he said, the Government imagined that they were' jroing to make these fertilisers with the fair end of the current they were much mistaken. Enormous tension and enormous power were required. No power under iiOOO horse-power could ,b» utilised with the slightest hope of making fertilisers. With 10.000 or 20.000 horsepower they would have a better chance of making them. But another point came in, namply, the fact that these particular fertilisers were no n«e on our new lands. There would be little demand for them, either here or in Australia for many years to come. He as a scientific man, sounded a note of warnin? about State aid to the iron industry in connection with the Taranaki ironsands.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110915.2.49

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 72, 15 September 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
368

SCIENTIST ON THE BUDGET Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 72, 15 September 1911, Page 5

SCIENTIST ON THE BUDGET Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 72, 15 September 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert