Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OFFSHOOT OF CRIPPEN CASE.

SOLICITOR'S MISCONDUCT. By Cable—Press Association—Copyright London, June 20. The Law Society has found Arthur Newton, Crippen's solicitor, guilty of professional misconduct in giving the Daily Chronicle and John Bull what purported to be correspondence emanating from Crippen in gaol, knowing auch correspondence did not exist. The evidence showed that Newton concocted the letters. The High Court is considering the matter. Newton's counsel admitted that Mr. Horatio Bottomley, M.P., the editor of John Bull, contributed £3O towards Crippen's defence.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110622.2.41

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 334, 22 June 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
82

OFFSHOOT OF CRIPPEN CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 334, 22 June 1911, Page 5

OFFSHOOT OF CRIPPEN CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 334, 22 June 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert