Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE AUSTRALIAN NAVY

ADMIRAL HENDERSON'S SCHEME. IS IT FEASIBLE? By Oable—Press Association—Copyright. Sydney, March 14. Admiral Henderson's report says that once the command of the sea is lost by the Empire no local system of defence, naval or military, could secure Australia's autonomy, and she would be the prey of the strongest maritime Power. Australia should depend on the fleet, and should spend a sum bearing the same proportion to the Imperial naval expenditure as Australia's population and oversea commerce bear to those of Britain. On this basis the annual naval provision would be four millions, increasing proportionately with the increase of population. The complete fleet would be divided into eastern and western divisions, each under an Admiral or Commodore. The divisions would again be divided into squadrons or flotillas. Sydney would be the primary base for the eastern, and Frcmantle for the western divisions, with destroyers, submarines, and sub-bases at other ports. The two divisions would not always be kept to their own bases; the ships would from time to time be exchanged to give the officers and men a chance of acquainting themselves with the Australian waters; also there would be yearly manoeuvres. The Herald, discussing Admiral Henderson's report, after reference to the large capital outlay involved and the possibility of the estimtacs being conservative ones, says: "We do not assert that these things are impossible, hut must look fairly in the face the chance they have of being done, and not fritter away money and strength on trivial patchwork attempts to set such a scheme afloat." The Telegraph commends the value of the recommendations, but whether the Commonwealth can find the money to build and man the ships is problematical, i It strongly endorses Admiral Henderson's contention that the administration must be free from political influence, and suggests that a navy taking twenty-two years to build is in danger of being obsolete before it is finished.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110315.2.25

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 262, 15 March 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
319

THE AUSTRALIAN NAVY Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 262, 15 March 1911, Page 5

THE AUSTRALIAN NAVY Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 262, 15 March 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert