THE WARATAH INQUIRY
NEWSPAPER COMMENT. By Cable—Press Association—Copyright. London, February 23. The Globe says that the fault in the Waratah must have lain in a hidden defect. The court was clearly of opinion that all the facts had not been revealed. It was remarkable that, as the vessel was of a new type, the captain's correspondence contained only trivial details. The court's remark that "the inference was unfavorable to the owners" was a very severe censure, on which comment was unnecessary. OWNERS' DIFFICULT POSITION. Received 24, 0.50 p.m. London, February 24. The Shipping Gazette, commenting on the "Waratah enquiry, says that while the Court apparently believed the owners' evidence was less complete than it might have been, it must be remembered that the owners in such cases were facing a position of considerable difficulty. There was always the question of legal responsibility to be considered. It was impossible to suppose that, however inconclusive, the moral of the case would be altogether lost to naval architect, shipbuilder, or shipowner.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110225.2.29
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 248, 25 February 1911, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
168THE WARATAH INQUIRY Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 248, 25 February 1911, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.