Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE COURTS.

f SLY GROG SELLING-. 'By Gable—Press Association—Copyright , | Wellington, Yesterday. Charles Reaton, who/ while engaged , in doing the walking "lighthouse" businees of sly grog selling yesterday, | sold beer to & police probationer. <ja>~ Court today Reaton was fined 4510, or->> * one month's imprisonment. He ynis also to three months ' for 1 being an idle and/disorderly person;. / COMPANY LAW. Wellington; Yesterday.' ,■ Eleven companies were proceeded ; 1 against in the Magistrate's Court lor , failing to comply, with section 101 gt tW Companies Act in not furnishing required information By a certain dqj; It was stated that the breaches we»' of a technical nature, arid small ftnpl'' were imposed, ' - BUSH TRAMWAYS. Taihape, Yesterday. ?■„] A case which lasted for. three oaya, ' before the Stipendiary Magistrate Hi-' t ished on Saturday. The case wasof. great interest to bush farmers and saw-'"' millers. The Egraont Box Company applied for an order for the right to., take a tram through property Including the homestead of David Wflki^ t Of . Ohutu. Tlxe question at issu6 wWwhether there was any practical or suitable route except through , the home-, stead. Already a tram exists along the ' road, hut plaintiffs claimed this route ■ was not suitable. Considerable' evidence was taken on this point, also re damage;' to Wilkie's property, he contending tuat it would be impossible to wotfe the farm if the order was granted. Ex-. . pert evidence from engineers wag given on both sides, Mr. Beere, for defendant, 1 showing that the,road route was equally/ good and possiblv as cheap. The "Magi#- 1 trate refused the order in respect to the homestead section, plaintiffs, <Bl : whom the onus lay, -having failed prove that no other route was ) The question as to the other section was held over, also that of costs. Mr. Myers was for plaintiffs, Mr. Morrison I for defendants. \

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19100705.2.48

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 73, 5 July 1910, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
301

THE COURTS. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 73, 5 July 1910, Page 5

THE COURTS. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 73, 5 July 1910, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert