Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LA MILO.

ACQUITTED OF FRAUD. By Cable—Press Association—Copyright London, May 2. The judge, in summing up, declared that the evidence against La Milo was insufficient. Easten and La Milo were acquitted, and Eggena was sentenced to twentyone months' hard labor. MOTOR MERCHANT'S STORY. On the close of the case for the prosecution of the well-known music-hall artist, La Milo, and her fellow defendants, the pleas for the defence were opened at Bow street on the eighth day of the hearing of the £SOOO conspiracy charge (says a telegram dated March 10). The three defendants are Pansy Montagu, or Eggena ("La Milo"), Ferdinand Eggena, and Percy Holland Easton. The last word in the prosecution consiftett of evidence called with the object or showing that La Milo paid a Leicester Place dressmaker's bill with two £SO notes, which formed part of the money received 'by Eggena from the pawning of the jewellery which the prosecution alleges he obtained from Mr. Wood o"i ilu security of 25 motor-cars for which be had only paid a deposit to Mr. Easton.

A feature of the ca*e was the suggestion made on behalf of Easton that his signature had been forged by Eggena to a document acknowledging the receipt of the 25 ears, and undertaking to hold them at the motor house at the jeweller's disposal. Mr. Symmoits. on behalf of La Milo. submitted that a jury would not convict her. Assuming that there had been a fraud, what was there to show that she was a party to it ? She had never negotiated any part of the arrangements by which the cars were to be taken as security for payment of the jewels. The ieweller, Wood, and his manager, Mr. TeKer, who were men of business, -both believed that the transaction with the Motor House was n. perfectly legitimate one. nnd if thev believed it why should not La Milo have believed it? If La Milo was the wife of Ferdinand Epgcna. then her defence was all the stronger. The Magistrate (Mr. McrshanO pointed' out that there was no evidence at present that she was Eggena's wife. "I can't say there is no case against her." the Magistrate proceeded. "She must go for trial." La Milo accordingly pleaded not guilty, and reserved her defence.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19100504.2.37

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 380, 4 May 1910, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
379

LA MILO. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 380, 4 May 1910, Page 5

LA MILO. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 380, 4 May 1910, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert