Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

BREACHES OF AWARDS. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Wellington* Last Night. Brcachc* of award cases were heard by the Arbitration Court to-Uny. Martin Hurrcll and Suaddou were charged with luiving employed' a uoa-unianist when unionists were disengaged, iu contravention of the carpenters' award. It was contended for the defence that th-3 iiiun employed was an expert staircase hand ami received more than union wages. The Court was not satisßedthat equally competent unionists were available a-.ul dismissed Hie case. In the case against W. .1. Lan'ksliear, printer, for not paying for a holiday observed on the Prince of Wales' Birthday, the question was whether that day came under the typographical award, not being specifically mentioned. The Court held respondents guilty of a breach but as .1 penalty was not pressed for no order i was made. (Ivorge James Auger was i fined £.5 for employing non-unionists, i irad one of the persons so employed was 1 lined Ms. In an inUrpretution case, the v Court held it was not necessary to cin-

ploy cither a compositor or au apprentice to pull proofs. The Court ordered, liy agreement between parties concerned, limitation, of liability for six years in a compensation case in which Walter

("william had been injured through, falling from a structure used in the erection of a building by Campbell and Jiurkc. The point was that claimant had suffered 'fracture of the skull, and had been incapacitated up to the present, and the Court was asked to define the period of liability. William Ihinvll was ordered to pay Court fec< f.; employing u jounteywau at less ilia.i award rates. In the case brought liy tins Carpenters' Union against McLean ! and Sons, a friendly action, for the pur- I pose of interpretation, the Court held that the work of wharf construction did Jlot come under the carpenters' award.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19090316.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 43, 16 March 1909, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
307

ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 43, 16 March 1909, Page 2

ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 43, 16 March 1909, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert