THE SYNOD AND NO-LICENSE.
To the Editor. Sir,—"G.H.M." takes me to task as to the alleged inaccuracy of statements made concerning Rev. Palmer, to which 1 reiterate that in the pamphlet referred to were enclosed speeches by liishop Julius and Rev. Whitehousc, of Cliristchureli and Ashburton and the postscript on the Rev. Palmer's letter was vague .enough to leave the public ti suppose that the Synod referred to was (,'linslchurch. Why, 1 should like to ask, did Rev. Palmer not mention Auck-1 land Synod, if his postscript referred to same! It is interesting to note that the Auckland Synod is the only one! supporting JJo-licciise. Christchurch is I not in favour and Auckland has left 't alone'/ Why? Hceause the No-lieense areas arc within those latter two dioceses, and its non-success is most apparent to both the clergy and laity there. Beware, readers, says "U.H.M.," to which 1 reply "Veritas Vincit." Hence my siom-deplume, ABSOLUTE FACTS.*
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19081106.2.33.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 269, 6 November 1908, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
156THE SYNOD AND NO-LICENSE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 269, 6 November 1908, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in