APPEAL COURT.
Per Press Association. Wellington, July .'O. Continuing bis argument for respondent in the appeal case Keddie v. Millar, Mr Raymond contended that.tlnnigh the fine indicted was in its inception a penalty in enforcement of the award, it was by section 101 of the Arbitration Act treated merely as a civil deb", a'd imprisonment for its non-payment had been abolished by the Art of ISTt. If the fine still remained a penalty it waa penalty recoverable only by an action for debt and therefore' the remedy of a writ of attachment, which was devised really as a remedy for contempt of Court was not, available. The Court reserved judgment.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19070731.2.11.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 31 July 1907, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
110APPEAL COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 31 July 1907, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in