Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

Per Press Association. Auckland, .Mint 1 0. A wdl-drcssd young man, Frederick William l.m-as. was charged before Mr Justice J)i'iiiiiston at the Sii{iivii»< ('i)iirl criminal .sitting with having committed perjury at the magistrate's court, I'ukckulie, «ni .March 7th and Bth. Accused. who pleaded not guilt;,', was defendant ill a paternity case lienrit lit Pukekohe, anil in giving evidetce, swore that at no lime had he been alone willi the plaiutill', lOva Hurt, nr-d was not called to Hart's gate on August Bth, 111(111, by Nellie Hurt, hat went there of his own ac'•01(1. These statements were in contradiction to I lie witnesses for the plaintiff, anil were the subj'c.t of the charge, Ac•used swore, to these statements on March 7th, and repeated them next day, when he was cautioned and examined

hy plaintiff's solicitor. Eva Hart, aged 17, deposed that on February Ist, "11)00, die was alone with accused, whom she met when she was returning from the railway station about two miles from her home. As to the incident at the ;.!-.te of Hie house the witness said Ulcus ■Mil not come voluntarily. She saw him passing the house, and requested her sister to run out and shout to him to slop. This was done, and witness had a conversation with accused about, hei trouble. The first remark made by Lucas was: "What do yon want me for?'' Nellie Hart, sister of the last witness, corroborated the previous witness' statement. Accused denied the charge, and palled a number of witnesses with a view to proving an alibi. The jury, however, found hiin guilty. Sentence was deferred till to-morrow. Inverairgill, June (i.

The Supreme Court was occupied nearly all day hearing the appeal of Mrs McAulilf against the decision by Mr McCarthy, R.M., in the Shamrock sly-grog case. The hearing took the form of a re-trial, and evidence was called on both sides. Judge Chapman reserved decision. Two motions came before the Judge in respect to the ship Stephana Razetlo. the cil'ect of which is that matters are now settled in the action in respect to the arrest of the ship under Lloyd's bottomry bonds and that ali parties are discharged therefrom with the exception of the ship and freight, and tlie cargo of two consignees, whicli is .still under arrest owing to these consignees having failed to make any satisfactory arrangements with plaintiffs. The case wil come before the Court again at Dunedin on Tuesday when it is understood plaintiffs intend to proceeed to trial in action.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19070607.2.13.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 59, 7 June 1907, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
420

SUPREME COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 59, 7 June 1907, Page 2

SUPREME COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 59, 7 June 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert