ARBITRATION COURT.
Per I'ress Association. Auckland, May 8.
[ At the hearing of the tramway dispute to-day, L\ M. Hiuincn, managing director of 11-,e Auckland Tra'nwav Company, talcd that if tli a-.eu's demands were ; : ; ..iv.-il to, the :. ; xtra expenditure would be elii:-;i Miaue.llv. Tin company's av, i-,,,- p.--:;.- -'-i-e bleep!'"" had be.-n :,■•■■■ per iei,(.. > '■.' Ii he ,|i,| „ot consider i.uiiieicut to. .-■■!■:■, ;-. risky 1,u.,i----ness. The profits in :.;o, amounted (u C2"i,(|:ni, of which i li.eoi) •,, is allowed for deiM-eeiation, la;, mis v ,: not suflicienf. The company u..» .-irii.'d twentvtwo million passengers a year.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19070509.2.14.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 59, 9 May 1907, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
91ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 59, 9 May 1907, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in