Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRADES DISPUTES BILL.

Lobsok, December 5. In the Home of Lords, during the debate on the second reading of the Trades Disputes BiU, the Marquis of Lansdowne admitted that legislation for the relief of trades unions was ineTitable. The present Bill would bring ruin, and bodily and mental suffering to individuals, and loss, danger, and inconvenience to the community, owing to the excessive privileges it conferred Nevertheless, since the electors bad given a mandate he would not divide the House on the Bill.

Lord Halsbury denounced the Bill as legalising tyranny.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19061207.2.17.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81899, 7 December 1906, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
91

TRADES DISPUTES BILL. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81899, 7 December 1906, Page 3

TRADES DISPUTES BILL. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81899, 7 December 1906, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert