SUPREME COURT.
Per Press Association. Chwstchubch, August 13, Francis Henry Bruges, solicitor, and James Goodman, clerk, were charged at tho Supreme Court to-day with, stealing £260 in March, 1001, and £2OO. in April, 1903, belonging to Henry Tuck. Evidence was given that tho moneys were handed by Tuok to Goodman to be invested on mortgage, but they were not so invested, and Tuck had lost the money. Bruges stated he was absolutely unaware that such transactions had bren carried on, sni he had been misled by Goodman. The money lending portion of the business, was under the control of Goodman, * Latbb. •In the Bruges-Goodman ease, no evidence was called on behalf of Good* maa. The jury retired at half.past M$- * and at 11.45 p.m. returned with a verdict of " Guilty" against both acoused, They were remanded till to-morrow for. sentence.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19060814.2.12.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 8181, 14 August 1906, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
140SUPREME COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 8181, 14 August 1906, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in