SUPREME COURT.
FMOUNG v. POLLOCK, ' This long-siaiiding Stratford action came to an end on Friday afternoon in the Supreme Court. II being evidently the last day of the sittings, and no one having appcaerd for plaintiff since it commenced, Mr Samuels asked the to have the case called in an open Courl.cxplaining that he was counsel for defendant (instructed by Mcssrs Malnue, McVoagh and Anderson), and that if was an action for .C3UOI) and an injunction, which had been set down for hearing at the last sitting of Ihe Court at Now Plymouth,- but had been adjourned until the present sitting.
His Honor ordered the case to be called, and the plaintiff to be cited, both inside and outside the Courthouse. There being no appearance of plaintiff, Mr Samuel further explaiuel that the plainlill's application for an injunction had been already refused at Auckland, and he moved, under a specilhM-iile, thai judgment be entered dismissing the action, with costs against the plaintiff, granting an authority showing that plaintiff was entitled to this judgment as of right.
His Honor ordered lliat Judgment to Utcred pccordingly,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19060326.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 8068, 26 March 1906, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
184SUPREME COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 8068, 26 March 1906, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in