Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A Very Proper Verdict.

I'EHJ UllY CASE DISMISSED. (Per Press Association.) WELUNUTTN, May 5. The charge against John Howley, a police constable, of having committed perjury at the Magistrate's Court, Wellington, on February 27, in connection with two charges uguinst one James Kennedy, of being un idle and disorderly person, in thut he consorted with reputed thieves and prostitutes und with l»e----in« keeper of brothel, was concluded in the Supreme Court before the Chief Justice. The alleged perjury lay iu i tyi I How ley hati «\\ orn to segjng Kennedy in the company of bad characters on December 20th |«nd 27th amongst other dates, und making an entry in ills notebook at the time.

Efcidonco for the Crown went to show that Kennedy wos at Pulmer»ton on the dates upon which he wag alleged to have been in Wellimrton. ° For the dafonce won given by 'lHioh. Vilzsiuumnti and his wife, who swore thul they saw Kennedy in t licidhop on Deceiuber 27. U was uljout, two months ufter Kennedy was first prosucutud thill witnesses rememfx-red 'having seen hiui on the a«t« given. Ttoev flrst mentioned the incident to u detective who was in llowiey's company. In Humming up, his Honour said he thought it had cast it bad flavour over I lie case to cull mous and his wife to give evidence for accused. It was for the to Hiy whether the evidence of. these two should outwvfeU th# evidence ( ,i six or nevcn witries'es lor iJuwC|it(ou, t tho name time tlit'l- the jury thought n„. Fit,,.,,'' mons were swearing fairly or not they i,lust bring in tt verdict ~i 'lot guilty unlfftV saWKfirri »h.* accused had deliberately «nd dvMirnod£ 8 "or" falsely K^l t ivy." ly °* KJ '° l " U,s taken UrtS £°*7.; W™'""™. I m„ !t ry PMI«* verdict. I UJU not goiug, to direct a nmnxMi- ;", n ®K°tn»t Kitzsimuions nod hU ihi r 1 think 'I ' s the dutv of thi- police to make Inquiries into U) 1 " iho'n' n ' J,h ' B shou, < " lesson tho police to kg vcrv caivfui in evideuce they bringVioa Z

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19050506.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7815, 6 May 1905, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
347

A Very Proper Verdict. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7815, 6 May 1905, Page 2

A Very Proper Verdict. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7815, 6 May 1905, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert