Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Divorce.

U'sr Prtas Association.) WELLINGTON, August 20. The divorce case Gray v. Gray, in which the petitioning wife recently secured a decree nisi, was again before the court to-day touching the question of alimony. Respondent offered £36 per annum in addition to half the marriage settlement i£S4\ making a total allowance of £7B. Petitioner's counsel contended that this amount constituted a pro niium to wrong-doing, as under the marriage settlement the wife was entitled to £B4 while living) with her husband, aaid now because of his wrong-doing he was only offering half. Ho claimed £l5O per annum as a suitable allowance. Judgment was reserved.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19040822.2.14.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVI, Issue 195, 22 August 1904, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
104

Divorce. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVI, Issue 195, 22 August 1904, Page 3

Divorce. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVI, Issue 195, 22 August 1904, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert