Forgery op Perjury P
(Pur Press Association.) WELLINGTON, May 31. Mr Justice Cooper made some strong comments in a case which bos heen before him during the past two : ' a - vs '_ A. E. Schultz claimed from tV. Kelly £2Ol damages as alleged failure to fulfil an agreement as to helping plaintiff to (fet a wholesale license. One of the main points was whether the sum of £lO that plainli(l was to pay defendant for the license appeared, or did not appear in tlie stock-sheet that passed at the time of the sale. Plaintiff maintained »™t it was m the stock-sheet and defendant said it was not. His H#m plainurt Tf CVM< ; >r,t that plaintiff and his son haid committed perjury m untruthfully sunnnrfiZ the copy of the stock sheet or til, ' defendant and his son h«<l ° Jed forgery and in™": the original stock-sheet. IIS impossible to .say which side was telling the truth and couklTi * ting the other side of foracrv or C him I? nonsuitcd Plaintiff? ieavK him the opportunity of taking* the cose before another tribunal ma i.i a j»rj, and ordered' all the —m-BaLfea Mcopt the iteepm u-
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19040601.2.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVI, Issue 126, 1 June 1904, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
191Forgery op Perjury P Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVI, Issue 126, 1 June 1904, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in