THE ACCIDENT INSURANCE CASE.
iIPEB PBESS ASSOCIATION. Napier, September 1, Mr. Turnbtill, S.M., gave judgment for the defendant, with costs, in the case of Ruscoe v. Holt, in which the plaintiff sought to recover moneys deducted from his wages for accident insurance during the last six years. The decision was based on the ground that plaintiff raised no objection until he left Holt's employ, so that he tacitly was a consenting party, and that the Wages Protection Act was not retrospective, and did not apply to moneys paid before it came into force, such payments being, until then,; expressly exempted from the operations I of the Truck Act.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19000903.2.12
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXII, Issue 193, 3 September 1900, Page 2
Word Count
108THE ACCIDENT INSURANCE CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXII, Issue 193, 3 September 1900, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in