S.M. COURT.
Monday, June 18 —Before Mr. E. L. Stanford, S.M. Judgment went for plaintiff by default in the following undefended cases Harbour Board v. H. Tate | judgment for costs, ss. T. Mark v. t R. B. Lees; claim, £3 12s 6d; oosta,' ss. DEFENDED CASES. W. Elliot v. I. Taylor.—Mr. Spenoe (Mr. Roy) for plaintiff; Mr. Weston for defendant. In this case claimed £2O, alleged to be the halaaee due for an entire horse bought lif defendant. The prioe agreed upon wai £6O. A counter-claim was lodged by i defendant for £3O, on the greUBM that plaintiff had represented the age of the horse to be eight yean whents reality it was ten years. After hearing the evidence, the reserved his decision. W. H. Pillar v. J. Lovsridg*,— Judgment for defendant for ooete, XI lls 61 Mr. Weston for plaintiff; Mr. Quilliam for defendant. . J. KempseU v. A. H. Judf ment fur plaintiff for £7, irvdrmta. £1 lis 6J. Mr. Quilliam for pkinttf*
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19000619.2.9
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXII, Issue 104, 19 June 1900, Page 2
Word Count
164S.M. COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXII, Issue 104, 19 June 1900, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in