CHARGES OF NEGLECT
Hunter Estate Case Press Association —Copyright. Wellington, June 23. Having been three daye in the witness box, Oscar Monrad, farming expent, concluded his evidence in the Supreme Court in the Hunter estate case to-day. Answering the judge, he said the fundamental charges were of not doing scrub-cutting when the subsidy was available, neglecting to replace in 1932-33 with at least 2000 good ewes, neglecting to cull and neglecting to sell cull lambs, especially* this year, when prices were exceptionally good. Charles Raymond Edgecomb, a theepfarmer at Hatuma, said he inspected the estate on March 6 and again on April 10. The property bore a generally neglected appearance. The court adjourned until to-mor-row morning.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TCP19370623.2.33
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 454, 23 June 1937, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
116CHARGES OF NEGLECT Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 454, 23 June 1937, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in