Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FARM WAGES

MANY BREACHES OF LAW Employers And Workers Hamilton, June 1. Prosecutions by the Labour Department will commence shortly If farmers and farm employees do not comply more closely with the provisions of the Agricultural Workers Act, according to a statement made from the Labour Department in Hamilton. It is stated complaints of breaches of the Act are steadily growing in volume, and Court publicity will have to be sought if the law is not heeded. Responsibility in the first place rests with the employer, it is stated, but in many cases of non-compliance with the law the employee has been found to be equally at fault. A common case is that of the employee who works for a wage less than that provided for in the Act and who demands back pay when he leaves his employer’s service. Dismissal Of Employees. Frequent complaints are received by the Labour Department that employees have been dismissed without due notice. Such cases usually come to one man’s word against another’s, and are b\st avoided by the employer invariably giving notice of dismissal In writing. In this connection the farmer often demands that one week’s pay be deducted when an employee leaves him without giving notice. Proper notice is required from both farmer and farm hand. Investigation of these cases wastes time and money and often involves officials of the Labour Department in a. considerable amount of travelling. Farmers ara also stated to be disregarding the law when they pay under-rate wages to. workers who have not applied for and received a permit to accept under-rate pay. This applies to physically unfit workers and parttime female workers. Inspectors of the department are frequently told that a worker is unfit, but until the employee of his own volition has applied for an under-rate permit, the employer is .liable for full wages. Holiday Pay Provisions. Complaints that allowance for holiday pay has not been made are common, although a farm hand is legally entitled to an annual holiday on cash wages, plus half his usual board and lodging allowance. Some farmers, further, are making deductions from wages where no board and lodging is provided, and the employee, and perhaps his family, is occupying a cottage.

In such a case, it is stated, the employee should be paid his cash wage plus full board and lodging allowance and the wages book should be signed by the employee for the full amount owing. An agreement should also be made concerning rent for the cottage, firewood, and food and other commodities supplied. Failure to do so leaves the employer open to prosecution.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TCP19370601.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 447, 1 June 1937, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
435

FARM WAGES Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 447, 1 June 1937, Page 3

FARM WAGES Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 447, 1 June 1937, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert