Correspondence.

Colonist, Volume II, Issue 104, 19 October 1858, Page 3

Correspondence.

To the Editor of the Colonist. Sib, —Knowing how very recently the Suspension Bridge was erected, I was surprised to see it styled in the Examiner " a perfectly worn-out structure." Without questioning the accuracy of the statement, I confess I do not understand how iron and red pine should so soon be only fit for the marines. On the few occasions of going over it, I have wondered that some means have not been tried to lessen the very needless and disagreeable vibration which -has doubtless helped to wear it out. With respect to the (to me) new features in engineering and architectural works, that of requiring the tenderers for executing the work to furnish plans and specifications, I should be surprised if it were satisfactory, as I doubt the capability of the class likely to execute the work to give satisfaction in the engineering department, though ' probably very competent workmen ; but I admit there are exceptions. Is it done to save the expense of a civil engineer ? If so, does it answer ? I am glad, to hear that it is contemplated to bridge over the Maitai in Bridge-street. It is high time that this, oue of the main streets, should have an uninterrupted roadway. "Would it not be better, while about it, to make a cart-' bridge ? Why a comparatively unfrequented street should have been selected has often caused me surprise. The span surely could not be the reason, nor the approaches. Should the Board of Works decide on making a bridge, I would advise them (without I debiting them 6s. Bd.) to use wire instead of chains, as being cheaper and safer; and as I hear the " worn-out" one is not worth the expense of removal, to make the legal gentleman a present of it if he will undertake to keep it passable. Yours, &c, THETA. October 12. To the Editor of the Colonist. Sir,-—The paragraph headed Richmond in. your last impression, which was " communicated," requires alteration:—The Monthly Magazine is only discontinued until the Debating Society is re-established in the Institution. The Biblical Association is not a discussion Society, and it does not hold its meetings on alternate Fridays, as stated by your correspondent. The lecture night is Thursday. Sermons may not be heard on Tuesday and Wednesday evenings in each week (as we might be led to suppose), but on alternate weeks. Not being conversant with the stable-talk of Bichmond, we have not heard a report about a ball, but believe the new stablea are to be opened with a theatrical entertainment. Yours, &c, E. H.