JUDGMENT SUMMONS ORDERS
In the Magistrate's Court, Taupo on Thursday, September 29, bei'ore j Mr W. A. HaiTow, S.M., a large? rairn- i ber of judgment siuumons eases than usual was dealt with. In the eases listed below orders were made for | payment of the amounts and costs i meiitioned, with imprisonment for the, periods mentioned in defaulT of pay- j inent : Lorna Barrett v. Edward John Bowles, £44 13s 9d and £2 2s, 47 days; K. Russell, Ltd., v. W. Chase, £11 16s 2d and £1 ls, 13 days, order suspended so long as debtor pays £1 per week ; A. H. Forbes v. Albert Clark, £29 10s 7d and £2 2s, 32 days; Rotorua Meat Co., Ltd., v. F. Crawford, £9 12s 11 d and £1 ls, 11 days. Casson and Co., Ltd., v. A. B. Donaldson, £93 15s 4d and £2 12s 6d, three months, order suspended so long as debtor pays £4 per fortnight; Tuek Bros. (Supplies and Services), Ltd., v. T. Fawcett, £19 15s and £1 11s 6d, 21 days; M. Amundsen v. Ben Hepi, £2 4s and 10s 6d, three days; C. E. Baker, Ltd., v. Ben Hepi, £1 16s and 10s 6d, two days : Casson and Co. v. B. Hepi, £69 11s 9d and £2 12s 6d, 72 days ; Commissioner of Inland Revenue v. Bernard Hepi, £37 3s 6d and £2 2s, 39 days. Taupo Stores, Ltd., v. Tai Hepi, £9 15s 9d and £1 ls, 11 days; Commissioner of Inland Revenue v. Tai Hepi, £14 10s Od and £1 11s 6d, 16 days; Robert Lewis King v. J. Hiki, £18 ls Sd and £1 11s 6d, 20 days; G. Habib v. Richard Hodge, £2 6s 3d and 10s 6d, three days ; R. A. Pole v. C. H. Hopkins, £146 5s 4d and £2 12s 6d,
three months. Erics Variety Stores, Ltd., v. B. Kapua, £31 9s 3d, by instalments of £5 per fortnight; W. Marr, Ltd., v. Mrs C. Mills, £5 3s 3d and 10s 6d, six days ; L. E. Alve v. Hora MgarnotuC £1 15s and 10s Od, 48 hours; Buckleigh's Motordrome, Ltd., v. Margaret Hinewai Pitiroi, £3 19s and 10s 6d, four days; ,T. R. Kapoor v. Boy Iiangi, £52 18s ld, by instalments of £1 per week; Robert Lewis King v. H. Rivers, £21 6s lld ancl £1 11s 6d, 23 days; Robert Lewis King v. E. Seymour, £77 8s Od and £2 12s 6d, S0 days. F. G. Sommerville and A. F. Lever | v. L. G. Sunnex, £3 ls and 10s 6d. j four days; Giilies Motors, Ltd., v. E. A. Winchcombe, £66 6s 2d and £1 12s, by £20 forthwitli and £1 per week; D. M. Hawkins v. E. Winchcombe, £21 19s and £1 11s 6d, 24 days; Robert Lewis King v. A. Wikiriwhi, £23 11s 4d and £1 11s 6d, 25 days.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAUTIM19551007.2.14
Bibliographic details
Taupo Times, Volume IV, Issue 193, 7 October 1955, Page 2
Word Count
475JUDGMENT SUMMONS ORDERS Taupo Times, Volume IV, Issue 193, 7 October 1955, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taupo Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.