Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Proof Of the Pudding.

(To THE EDITOR.) Sir, —You have been kind enough on former occasions to publish articles from my pen upon the results of NoLicense criminality. I contend, Sir, that anything that will reduce crime to one-fourth of its present volume, and reduce drunkenness more even than is worthy, both of all the space a newspaper editor will give it, and of the best consideration of every voter in New Zealand. I will endeavonr as briefly as possible to show that No-license has accomplished both these facts at Port Chalmers: — xr> I M ■a *4 O o 43 ot s o P S H p O

Most of the 53 drunkards were arrested at the Port Chalmers railway station returning drunk from. Dunedin and hence should be charged up as Dunedin drunkards. To show how nearly crime has been “ blotted out” at Port Chalmers, I will analyse the last six months’ record. There were 27 drunkards arrested. I ascertained that 22 of these were arrested either at the railway station or on their road home from it. There were also 11 offences of various sorts. The three principal of these were one insolence in a railway carriage, one violence in a railway carriage, and also one indecent act in a railway carriage.

This shows where the crime comes from —“ By their fruits ye shall know them” and the fruit of the licensed liquor traffic is insolence, violence and indecency. This then leaves a beggarly total of 13 offences and drunkenness against a total of 147 similar lapses tl at might have been expected under license in tbo same period. This is strong testimony. The principal business man of the Port, Mr John Watson, has also given testimony that as regards business, the Port was getting along very nicely indeed. The man who is perhaps the principal employer of labour outside the Union S.S. Co., has also been heard to declare that “it was as good as £SO a year to him, because of his men keeping more regular time.” I am, etc., G. Bernard Nicholls. Dunedin. Otago Agent of New Zealand Alliance.

Last year of License 191 99 293 1904 No License 53 24 77 Total reduction in one year 216

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN19050810.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Te Aroha News, Volume XXII, Issue 42759, 10 August 1905, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
374

The Proof Of the Pudding. Te Aroha News, Volume XXII, Issue 42759, 10 August 1905, Page 2

The Proof Of the Pudding. Te Aroha News, Volume XXII, Issue 42759, 10 August 1905, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert