Warden’s Court, Te Aroha

Te Aroha News, Volume XIV, Issue 2103, 14 May 1898, Page 2

Warden’s Court, Te Aroha

(Before R. S. Bush, Esq.)

Residence Sites, Etc. —H. F. Gotz for Section 8y Block 32, Morgantown, objected to by W. Mackie. This'was adjourned from, last Court, and as the •objector was not prepared to pay up 12‘ years arrears &t rent at the rate of £5 per annum, the Warden granted the. section to the present applicant, the rent tp be ■£s. per annum, and 14 days io be allowed Mackie in which to remove his improvements. Costs £2 2s were granted against the objector. • - • Anna Mary Harris, application for exchange of title This was adjourned in order to permit of some arrangement, as thare was an encumbrance on the -section,.

Edward Gallagher,. 2: applications for exchange to. title. Both granted Mining Applications—Andrew Allen, Taranaki and Ruakaka Special Claims Both applications recommended, and to be granted in name of Montezuma G,M. Go. .

Montezuma G.M. O'}., applications for machine site,, Tui Creek, and tramway from. Tui terminal! to, Cb.’s. works. Both granted.. i . Montezuma G'.M. Cb,, application, for machine site, 4 acres, at EuilerV Spur, Waiorongomai.. Granted!.. Applications for Pvetection, etc*— Pi She win, protection for Loyalty Palace L;II. As had been granted frequently to. this property His Worship declined to grant this application, but granted-, permission to work with 2l men for 1; month.

The applications of R‘. Dovell for protection for Te Aroha S.C; and permission to work with less mea in the Te Aroha Extended S.C' were withdrawn. In the former case the VYardseu decliued to grant absolute protection. S: MS. COURT..

A. Lay bourn v John Jackson. Jludgm<’n:., for plaintiff, £l. 17s 9d and costs6s. . . ■ •'• ■

Beale v Gotz-. This was a Gtise struck out last Court because hearing fe.o had not been, forwarded from Auckland,, where plaintiff’s evidence had been taken, r Mr Gilchrist, for plaintiff, asked for a re-instalment of the ease as matters had been adjusted. Mr O’ Meagher, for defendant, objected but His Worship, upheld the application. At the latter’s request the case- was adjourned till J ; uly to permit the presence of an important witness.