DUTY ON FRUIT.
Invercargill, Saturday. When asked his opinion respecting the proposed fruit, duties. Mr J C. Blackmore, Government* pomologist, stated that a rate of Id lb from November to April would be no protection to New Zealand fruit-growers whatever during November, December,’ and January. Tasmania had no apples or pears to export from the second week in February, and during March and April Hobart shipped to England and did not require the Now Zealand market. By taking, off the duty duri lg May, June, and July we would 1 e playing nicely, into Tasmanian growers’ hands, as they had - an- enormous I surplus, principally culls from the grading of English shipments, which i they were glad to sell at almost any j price. Mr Blackmore suggests that the duty might be reduced from the end of October.. To reduce during May, June, and July would; make New Zealand especially the Southern, dumping ground for. the surplus Tasmanian fruit, rendering it unprofitable for Northern growers to ship South. ■;
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18950925.2.13
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume XII, Issue 1773, 25 September 1895, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
168DUTY ON FRUIT. Te Aroha News, Volume XII, Issue 1773, 25 September 1895, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.