Resident Magistrates CourtTE AROHA.
TUESDAY, MARCH 4th, 1890. (Before H. W. Northcroft, Esq., R.M.) Williams v. Crocker : Claim £7 for goods supplied. Judgment by default for amount claimed with costs £2 Bs. Same v. McKenzie : Claim £4 10s for goods supplied. Judgement by default for amount claimed with costs L2 10s 6J. Brumby v. Roche } Claim £3 5s 9d for wages, (This case was a Ijourned from last Court day. Defendant had refused to pay plaintiff until hecompleted the whole of the draining. Plaintiff on the other hand asserted the contract was by the chain, and that consequently he was not bound to complete all the work laid off, if he found he could not do it at the price). Plaintiff now stated Mi* Roche had refused to let him finish up the drains partly made, when he went to do so. Defendant stated he had refused to allow plaintiff to do anything further, pending the decision of th n Court. He had been put to a great deal of loss and inconvenience through plaintiff leaving the work he had Undertaken to carry out. Judgement fof plaintiff for I 6s 9d,aml costs £2 9s. This was all the business.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18900308.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 452, 8 March 1890, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
199Resident Magistrates Court- TE AROHA. Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 452, 8 March 1890, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in