Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Resident Magistrates Court, Paeroa.

MONDAY, MARCH 3rd, 1890. (Before H. W. Northcroft, Ksq., It.M.) Ahxandcr Mackey, wns charged that he did permit a dog, known to him to have bitten a person, to be at large without being muzzled. Defendant promised to keep the animal on the chain, and the case was dismissed. Petty Debt Cases : P. Nowiil v. J. Gamble ; claim L 3 7s for boaid ami residence* No appearance of either party. Case struck out. Win. Boden v. C. F. Mitchell ; claim £ll 6s fid, work dune. Judgment for plaintiff for £5 12s, and costs £1 13s. D. cnodgrass v. Tbos. Melville and Peter Ferguson ; claim £5 tor trespass on aceitain block of land at Kaiangakake. Evidence given showed thata bridle track had existed over this block of land (known as Snodgra9s’ paddock, Karangahake), for many years, that it was daily used by the travelling public between Te Aroha and Karangahake, and the defendants believed they had a perfect right in using this track. Defendants having crossed the paddock by the usual track, were unable to proceed further on account of the slip pannel having been nailed up. They admitted breaking down the slip pannel so ab to pass through, believing they were justified in so doing, and that the track was a public right of way. Mr Tbeo. Cooper, who appeared for the defendants, submitted the Court bad no jurisdiction, that it was a matter to be decided in the Supreme Court only. Mr Miller appeared for plaintiff. Jurisdiction refused accordingly, costs £1 Is. D. Snodgrass v. A. Cornes ; claim £5 for trespass. This case was similar to the other. Plaintiff withdrew the case. Costs allowed defendant, £2 3s. Pnillips ,and Son v. Sir Win. Wasteneys; claim £2 6s 6d for valueless cheque. Judgment for plaintiff for amount and cost fis. E. Edwards v. S ; r ATn. Wasteneys ; claim £6, agency fees. Adjourned till next Court day ; notice having been given of defendants desire to have his evidence taken in Auckland. Witika Pirihi and others v, Owen Griffiths ; claim £6 for value of shares in land occupied by defendant. Judgment for £3 ss, and costs £1 16s 6d. W. and J. Quinlivan v. T. H. Russell. Application by defendant for a re-hearing. Mr Mille*, solicitor for defendant, and Mr Theo. Cooper, solieitorfor plaintiff. Adjourned till next Court day.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18900305.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 451, 5 March 1890, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
391

Resident Magistrates Court, Paeroa. Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 451, 5 March 1890, Page 2

Resident Magistrates Court, Paeroa. Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 451, 5 March 1890, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert