Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM.

Most of the afternoon of yesterday was occupied in the Upper Chamber with the adjourned debate on the Legislative Council Bill. The discussion wa& resumed by Mr 01i\ er. who denied that the necessity for any reform of the Chamber existed, inasmuch as members in fact had performed their work satisfactorily. It was all nonsense to suppose that any Government would flood their number for the purpose of furthering: their own ends. He maintained that an independent upper Chamber was absolutely necessai'y for the good government of the country, and said that if it could be proved that in the past the Council were not in sympathy with the people, probably some change as indicated by the Attorney-General might be advantageous, but he emphatically denied that this was so. He hoped the Bill would be rejected. The Hon. Mr Reynolds thought the time had now armed for a reform of the Council, and expressed the opinion that many of the appointments to it were in no way creditable to the Ministry of the day. A change in its constitution was called for both by the people and the press of the colony. The Hon. Mr Pbardzan admitted there were many objectionable clauses in the Bill, but as he considered the proposals of the Government demanded respectful thought he supported its second reading. Tfie Hon. Mr Scotland, in supporting the second reading, raised a laugh by declaring that if an aneel came from Heaven and framed a Bill ft would be kicked out by a majority of the Council, who considered themselves the acme of perfection in the duection of intelligence. He would vote for the motion in expectation of the measure being severely criticised in Committee. Dr, Pollen saw no reason for alteiing the Council, and moved that the Bill be lead a second time that day six months. The measure was also opposed by Hons. Messrs Wilson, Walker and Peacock, and the adjournment of the debate till to day wa& then agreed upon.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18890724.2.32.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 387, 24 July 1889, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
337

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM. Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 387, 24 July 1889, Page 5

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REFORM. Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 387, 24 July 1889, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert