Assessment Court. TE AROHA OUTLYING DISTRICT. AND TOWN DISTRICT.

Te Aroha News, Volume VI, Issue 369, 18 May 1889, Page 2

Assessment Court. TE AROHA OUTLYING DISTRICT. AND TOWN DISTRICT.

Messrs S. J. 3,eddon, It. 4 N. Putf,le, and J. ftuncjninn ', Board of Revjeyyers appointed to hear v objections, lodged, ayaipst valuations made under the Property Assessment, Act .for the above districts," sat at the Court House, Te Aroha, on Wednesday last at XI a.m.; Mr Seddon in the chair.';' , The following objections' were conr sidered, the objectors stating : the, valuations Wers -eieeegaire. Mr Hunt, Asaes- j sor, appeared ofi betialf of the Property Tax Commissioner : * ' Te Aroha Outlying 1 District : Agnes j Basket!, Sections 131, 132, Block 5,

Waiorongomai, £40. No appearance.. Valuation sustained. Nathaniel Boskott, Sections, $0, 31, Waiorongomai, £10. No 1 appearance,' Valuation sustained. W, J, England, Sections 113,114, Block 9, Waiorongomai, L£o. Ho Appearance. Valuation sustained. Kaehel Lloyd, Allotment 12, Section 8, To Arolia Purvey District, £160. |fo appearance. Valuation sustained. Saml. C Mack ay > part Secfion 13, BlocK* f2, Te 'Aroha Purvey District, LlOO. No appearance. Valuation sustained. 4 IV Aioha, Town District ; With reepeci to all the valuations refeired to w-thin Te Aroba Town District, it is the lessees interest? Only that is mentioned,. unless otherwise stated j the land being [ hold under Goldfields title. ! Chas, E. Balcke^ part of Sections 12, Block 6 (Whitokei>street, 2> 'shops), L 270. Do., Sections 102, 103, Lipsey's Block (dwelling house), LI 65, i Mr Ttalcke, on being sworn, stated he considered the valuations too high by LUO, In reply to Mr Hunt, Mr Balcke said he was getting Ss Cd per week rent for one of the shops. He valued his dwelling house as worth 108 per week. Valuation reduced to L 240 on the two shops. Valuation on the house sustained. Jas. Burtb, part of Ruaktika Block, 30 acres cut up into sections close to Te A rob a township, LIOO, and 17 acres adjoining, L5O, total LI SO (freehold). No appearance. Valuation sustained. Lous Elirenfried, Sections 1 and 3, Block 3 ; Section 7, Block 4. (Family Hotel, etc.), L 420. No appearance. Reduced to L 320. Margaret Gallagher, Sections I, 2, 3, Block 30 (2 dwelling houses, L 270 and Ll9O respectively), L 460. No appearance. Valuation sustained. William Gooding, Section 42, Lipspys Block (dwelling house), LillO. No appearance. Valuation sustained. Anna Maria Harris, part of Sections 2, and 15, Block 11 (store and dwelling house, Whitaker-street), and Section 33, Lipsey's Block (dwelling bouse ),%L24oNo appearance. Valuation sustained. Joseph Heathcote, Sections 9, 26, Lipsey's Block (dwelling house), Ll5O. No appearance, Valuation sustained T- and S. Morrin and Co., Sections 5, 6, 11, 12, Block 5 (store, etc., Whitaker-street), LGOO. No appearance; in lodging tho objection, however, the value of the store was stated to be L2OO. Mr F. Pavitt beim* referred to valued the premises at L3OO ; fencing, L3O. Reduced to L 330. T. and S. Morrin and Co., Sections 5, 12, Block 1 (boarding house, Whitaker-street), L4OO. No appearance. Valuation sustained. Samuel Jagger, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, Block 26 (Hot Springs Hotel, stables, etc., Whitaker-street), LI 500.. No appearance. Valuation sustained. Samuel Jagger, Sections ,4, 11,. 810ck 30 (stable, etc., adjoining Rev J. Marshall's late residence), L5O. No appearance. Valuation sustained. John Kennedy, Section 39, Lipsey's Block (small cottage), LBO. Mr Kennedy, on being sworn, stated he would accept L2O for the property. Reduced to Jj2o. H, P. Hornibrook, Section 14, Lipsey's Block (small 2 room cottage), L 55. Mr W. Hetberington appearqd on behalf of the 6wner, and on being sworn, stated he did not consider the property worth more that L3O. Reduced to L 35. Joseph Potter, Sections 6, 11, Block f> (store, etc., Whitaker-street), L2OO. No appearance. Valuation sustained. John Wallace, Section 60, Lipsey's Block (dwelling house), LllO No appearance. Valuation sustained. This was all the business.