A DIVORCE CASE. Invercargill, August 20.
Tiik divorce case, Geo. Tucker v. Mary Tucker and Jas. Christie (co-respondent), waa heard. This was a petition by the husband for divorce on ground of the wife's adultery -with the co-respondent. Petitioner put in a number of affidavits by wav of documentary ovidence. The othor parties woro nob represented. George Tucker deposed that lie was married to respondent in 1874 and lived with her up to 1885, when sho deserted him. While he was at Rivcr'ron his wife went away with Christie. Hehad themarrested in Wellington onachargeof larconyand broughtback. They were acquitted on the charge of larceny, but respondent then admitted to witness that she lived with co-respondent. The last he heard of her was that she was living- in Napier with Christie. When she v\ ent away she took with her all witness was worth, some £300 or £400. She wrobe to witness, and he simply replied to tho effect that lie did not want any correspondence wibh her at all. His Honor granted a decrco nisi with costa against the co-re&pondent, ttyc petitioner abandoning his claim to damages.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18880822.2.20
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 292, 22 August 1888, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
187A DIVORCE CASE. Invercargill, August 20. Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 292, 22 August 1888, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.