ALLEGED ILLEGAL SUPREME COURT PRACTICE.
It will be, no doubt, fresh in the memory of our readers that on a statement made by Mr dotter in Chambi rs, in the case Bennett v. llatkis, some tfcronij remarks vvere made \v ith regard to an irregular writ served. From inquities we have made, We are glad to hoar that it was purely due tb an error by the lawyer's cleik, who has written a letter stating that he inadvertently issued the draft copy which had been given to him for tho purpoFeof having ttye writ taken out at the Supreme Court in the ordinary way.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18850124.2.48
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume II, Issue 86, 24 January 1885, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
104ALLEGED ILLEGAL SUPREME COURT PRACTICE. Te Aroha News, Volume II, Issue 86, 24 January 1885, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in