SUPREME COURT.

Taihape Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3346, 26 November 1919, Page 4

SUPREME COURT.

. \\-’.{flLLl.'\i:}TCN, Nov. At the Supreme Court, in b3.1.c0,u to-day, the Chief Justice hem-6.‘ the‘ case United Farm-.=r's’ Co-op. Asseciz‘--, tion, Ltd. (in liqui«‘l=.~.tio.:l} v. David'Joseph Nathan, ;ne-:-chant, \’\7el.lingtoll. The defendant was called upon to «answer why an order should. not be made in terms uf a S|lll‘.ll3Ul2’~.‘ issued‘ in November 1917', or, 1.11 the aitevative, Why he should not be ordered to a account to the liqlli'*.z'.mr it the L'l:?+ed' Farmers’ Co oper.lti_ve As.=.o-:-ia'.;'on for the sum of ‘#3830, being the 1.-.-x.7ance Of a sum Of £33-33 «’zgl'et‘3 to he p2=‘7(i by him -:0 the said .Elui_-rlz‘.mr bfv’ agreement -I‘.-J.'r.e‘i Deceismer :")'th, 1917. It was alleged that whim riirocéer smd ' agent of the United I"arlnc»l‘s’ A.-EO- - D. J. Nathan made =1 PT°"i" sional sale of assets of the‘ United Farmers to the Wairaiaga Falm~3l‘s" Association at an under value; 3113 " procured the shareholders of the United Farmers to accept the Same Without disclosing to thin that he had secured for -himself certain ‘neiiefits, l After hearing argument his I-lonour I-.=,sel»ved decision.